Male

23/07/1987

well, it was fast. - (Loading in a new tab)- (opens in a fresh tab)- (loading in the specified tab) For the most part in my opinion, this won't make a huge impact at all, as anyone running windows 10 can continue to very easily use edge to download the chrome installer when setting up their computer. As for whether we'll see a functional version of chrome in the microsoft store sooner or later, that's unlikely. Windows central newsletter Get the best of windows central at in your own inbox every day! Dan thorpe-lancaster is the former editor-in-chief of windows central. He is commissioned from windows central, android central and imore as a news writer in 2014 and is obsessed with technology of all varieties. You have the option to follow dan on twitter @dthorpl and insta @heyitsdtl. F*** you google ^^ Why google? What did they do wrong in a case like this? Did they follow the rules? I don't see what rule our hackers didn't follow. There is no rule that says you can't have an application that simply opens a url page in your default browser, and this does just that. (Yes, they didn't force-remove it additionally) 10.8.5 your app can only promote or distribute software through the microsoft store. Okay, i think i can't read :d thank you for correcting me Hm, technically it was actually "promoting software through the store". What about the app" get office" which used to come from the factory... Or the "get skype" app they had "Came from the store" "they had", i think the past term answers your question. The rules are changing. Maybe read the article? It mentions why microsoft removed it. 10.10.4 your app's main content may not be ads, and ads must be clearly distinguishable from other content in the native app... They use the store, to promote chrome downloads... Not offering chrome in the supermarket... Or maybe it's easy revenge for other things *cough* youtube *cough* Note (windows 10 user) You're on the wrong site, that's the rule they didn't follow... They uploaded the app to the supermarket, which doesn't work as advertised for everyone tenth version s . That alone justifies the deletion. Was the "get office" app used just to present you with a link to download office? (Now called "my office" and does more) The difference is such in windows 10 s it directs users to the store to load office, so it's not difficult. Chrome is not available here, due to this windows 10 players are not allowed to use the application for its intended purpose, therefore it is misleading. What is the point of having an application that provides only a link to access the .Exe file you selected? And windows10s still can't install if it's not a real app from the store because it's basically useless and it's good to uninstall it before it gets so many downloads and too many people complain that using it won't work by 10s . The only app they deliver is a downloader for their viruses... Traditionally no programs for youtube, hangouts... True, how i am waiting for the **cough** version of itunes, imessage, apple music, apple numbers, apple keynote, etc. As a result, the company supports the version of the software used on any gaming platform. Here in this situation, i'm sure that google does not want to glow blocked depending on the ms rendering engine, what is it, in the absence of an option: for chrome. Suggestion.... Chrome... Meh, i'm organized using edge. Paying for edge on android when you have to use the chrome engine. Unfortunately, this is easily a little thing that microsoft is currently unable to resolve itself. Microsoft is not able to force others to use their own rendering engine or other software tools. Funny. Like this wasn't a small thing when google made microsoft pull the youtube app from wp? Google has created or changed rules to stifle competition more than once. The trolls here like to claim that microsoft has "junk" in that store, that many" (although in reality there are only a few) web profile shells, and now microsoft is pulling out real garbage, a web page that redirects customers to any. A site page, an application that does not offer real features, and does not provide any features, and the visitor complains. It's not microsoft stuff, it's special people like you trying to protect google over this cheap crap. Google can afford it. Youtube was established and strong. Google was probably trolling microsoft, but feasible, they also wanted people to be able to find chrome through the microsoft store, not fake ones. If microsoft is interested in their struggling store disappointing uninformed visitors - it's their choice. They just did it. @Bobcat665 oops! So many cons :) you told the truth and the delusional fans voted in advance :)) ms should lick @$$ from google for an installer like this, not take out a stretch film from such a pathetic market or was it a message from google saying: this is how your store is badly needed for them :)))) Apps submitted to the microsoft store must use the edgehtml rendering engine in order to protect user security. Microsoft doesn't want to allow apps in the store to enable other rendering engines, because then microsoft won't be able to control client security. Exactly how apple treats the ios app store rules for third party browsers. I'm not saying third party web rendering engines are insecure. I'm just saying, and it's in both cases that these principles exist because microsoft and apple want to ensure the health of users. See other comments on this page for specific microsoft store policy numbers. If you were talking about cellular devices, you could be right. This is a microsoft decision . . Android doesn't force you to use their engine. Firefox has a unique engine for android. However, ios forces you. The google guys who did this sat around and giggled when any guy said, "hey, look at him!" It was behind the scenes, but actually quite funny... Imho ;) Reminiscent of how google blocked the microsoft youtube app. Impressive microsoft .. .. It's amazing that this was actually published in the store from the very beginning. Doesn't give me stability in microsoft verification... Every software store uses automatic verification. This is probably a nuisance, with the methodology and process of checking "bridge windows", which will be resolved in the near future. Hold on to your pants. There is nothing in this application that could be considered harmful. It's just a single page browser based on the ms engine that opens any link clicked in the default browser. This includes a direct footnote to the chrome installer. You click the download button, accept the license agreement with you ready, and then your browser downloads the file. You actually have to run the downloaded installer yourself. You don't get the idea of publishing through the microsoft store. Personally, i can't get the idea these app stores exist in first turn. Of course, they can be perfectly used for paid applications, but people should be allowed to download any application from anywhere. And by that i mean, the fact is you don't need to fiddle with settings to allow "unknown sources" or download apps from unpublished apps. The only useful thing about these deeps is the ability to update products from source, but *nix package managers are able to do more, and support for adding third party application sources. The win10s user cannot use this specific application. For the common man, the facebook website, the uwp app and the executable, which one is more accessible? Definitely not exe... Would exe be safer than uwp? What about the nameless ones? Will people clean up the mess in the reg when they delete it? If msstore is not properly used or doesn't exist... What forces consumers to switch to other libreelec, openelec, osmc? Ios and android may one day be fast enough to run traditional windows software, and if they are ported in the list, others will follow. Windows is gone, and it's too late to do anything to save it. * Other goodies... Msstore is also used in conjunction with (win10s, win10arm,) iot, ar, mr and xboxes, and xpa is recognized as a great feature. To increase security. Malware detected in the program? They know how to do the removal for you. Looking to keep your application up to date but not ready to annoy the user or deal with firewalls? Done through the shop. Are you an unknown developer just starting out and dreaming that visitors can find all visitors with limited ad money? The store is able to help with this (sometimes). In addition, blocking the download of non-published applications also blocks the installation of other applications without your knowledge. Such a move is not primitive security theater. Of course, the application may not be dangerous, but what if the developers of the ransomware were allowed to host the “installer” with us? They seem to like it wow, google is fine.......... What do you think about this fact #$ Can microsoft really work thus? So google should just abandon its own rendering engine and build it on top of microsoft's? Sorry, but microsoft can only play these tricks on the small developers it pushed away a long time ago. To put it bluntly, looking at the state of the store, google was kind enough to send the application to the microsoft flower shop. And this comes from someone who thinks google products are mediocre. Android and ios have the same cuts for browser apps. That's why the edge browser on android uses chromium It's not like that. Firefox uses its own engine for android and is live in the appstore. Microsoft uses chromium in edge simply because they don't want to spend valuable time porting their own engine. That's not true. Android doesn't have any caveats forcing anyone to use the chromium engine. Firefox on android is not considered a chrome shell. Ms decided to use this engine because they didn't want to port edge to android - they only care about making sure users can sync with edge on the desktop. Wrong, not so for android. "Android and ios have the same restrictions for browser applications" now i understand. The tenth version of s is a mobile system. Now this explains exactly how s stands for sucks or sucker. By the way, it's obvious that you have blinders on your fanboys. Android licensed by google does not require any other blocking of the browser engine. It does not force a specific immutable default browser. And yet this fact also does not fetter the search engine to one and only one search engine. For that matter, in ios apple doesn't tie the default search engine to one and only one search engine. When i look at the fanboys in this resource, i see travelers willingly cut off their noses to spit in their own faces. Fanboy != Fanboy. Now i'm a microsoft os fan, but i'm not a talkative idiot incapable of seeing weakness or anti-consumer behavior (like what microsoft is doing with their way or the highway mentality... Even the super blind apple haters in that place couldn't accuse apple of being that it imposes one and only one search engine on its visitors). The store, first of all, had its own rules. And they actually did it because other markets did it - it was done by the app store, it was done by the play store, why can't the microsoft store produce this set of works?)... Ios browsers (edge, all chrome and other devices use the safari rendering engine, similar to the forked safari browser. All browsers on android use the chromium rendering engine. They look like the forked chrome browser. This is no different for the microsoft resource. this statement about android is wrong. Incorrect. No, firefox does not use chromium or the blink engine - android has no such restrictions - only wm10 , wpx and ios provide this. "Trick"? Did you read the article? I agree.If google chrome is not allowed in the microsoft store due to microsoft policies, then probably microsoft needs to change its policies. Google chrome is allowed when it actually port the browser via centennial bridge or create a new uwp app . Must be a real web browser -> not an installer that redirects all users to another site to earn it. . Read the list the installer had; it announces upgrading to windows 10 pro to use the specified google chrome installer. Why is the policy applied to protect clients and secure their os. Which users? Can microsoft afford to do without apps? Why not let the excellent google browser? Edge is definitely more insecure. http://www.Tomshardware.Com/news/pwn2own-2017-microsoft-edge-hacked,3394... How many teams hacked edge versus chrome and how many teams should win? Here comes another troll I can definitely release my own big rendering engine and secretly register the user account name of consumers; plus a password... But google is no small fry, so they can make a deal with ms to use their engine. And suddenly something goes completely wrong, we know where google is. * This app won't work for you win10s, that alone is enough reason to turn it off imo. It's not easy for anyone that win10s clients love to torment browsing and kissing @$$ ms with which blocked a mediocre os in exchange for at least upgrading to pro to be able to use any standard application... Ms must praise the heavens when, finally, a major developer like google, took the time to even fiddle with the installer wrapped in a store app... But just like at any time of the day, without brains, microsoon acted like idiots. Courtesy? Really? So microsoft has to go all out in the name of the serious guys, as if they were just a new startup trying to make a name for themselves? Where in the universe have you landed? Google hasn't done anything for ms and uwp on mobile or desktop. They have removed ms apps for google services like youtube for reasons more stupid than this, even refusing to help ms in modding the store to a certain extent. There is no reason for ms to ever give google a free approach to this, at least not at a time when a move would confuse w10s users. "Logically speaking, this is misconception. Is unlikely to have an unimaginable impact as a normal windows 10 user can continue to apply edge very easily." Ftfy. Coming soon. ''Google responds to microsoft for deleting their windows factory app'' More like ''google responds to microsoft by blocking youtube in edge'' chrome to none microsoft is not blocked at once. Google didn't care about following the rules of the site where they wanted to post something. It's just that google does the least amount of work. . Just like that. Useless google app that has been here windows since windows 8.1 that only allows you to access google web search. Pro. Precisely to try and force microsoft out of the education sector so that google can have a monopoly. A stampede move by google, i say . Who wants chrome already knows where to get it. For those who don't know, usually whatever browser they use. "For those who don't know, usually whatever browser they use." People who don't know are called non-technical (or older) relatives who have a tendency to find any application they desire in "free application download forums" filled with viruses. And some people just hate to be those who have to clean up the mess they make without a chance to just type the name of the software into a search engine, but apply query strings like "free download" that will open these questionable resources.I know, that's why i won't use chrome for a second. Microsoft just remove their services from devices with chrome os. no one is interested in removing anything , given that they all use networks. Think before you post. We may have different definitions of the term "internet", but there are some that simply won't work without any application, like authenticator yes. Think before you post. http://www.Omgchrome.Com/microsoft-brings-office-online-chrome-web-store/ Office is now available in chrome books. actually there are, the play store is now implemented on chrome os Lol. You're funny. About time. I use chrome but agree with ms on the first one. Sometimes google is just lazy af. Fuck you scroogle shoes on the bottom foot follow the rules then so you can get a decent supplement to transport here microsoft. Therefore, microsoft tied edge updates to significant windows updates (about twice a year, more often only bug fixes and security updates). Meanwhile blocks the publication in the windows store of a browser that could be updated faster through new features that are related to the engine (for example, support for new standards). And for people with the tenth version of s ms blocks it completely, because they are not able to install anything from outside the store. Calm down. No one cares about the microsoft store anyway. That's why you post your impressions here. Nobody cares about round either this is an unsubstantiated comment, if google really wanted to host the originated browser on the resource, i believe you could deal with ms and practically publish it. Instead, they want to stay lazy so they don't have to do the body hair thing to host a browser with us. Even if the whores kept this movie with us microsoft, most of us wouldn't take advantage the chance to use this is because you need eight and ten pro to actually open the installer (as listed among, see photo). . It was just a scam as no one could use it consistently except for a small percentage of windows w10pro users. No. Only windows ten s users could not accept it, which is probably as high as 1% of windows ten s users. This was the goal to force schools and businesses to move away from windows ten s Why update your browser more often? W3c is moving quite slowly, so there is plenty of that. A year ago i used opera 12, steam desktop authenticator pc which by that time had not received updates for 2 years. From outside the store is stupid. This is, in fact, what the version is for. If you intend to put it outside the store, just don't purchase s. It's almost* as stupid as complaining about the fact that you can't set edge on a chromebook. I will say that you have a point from the first part of your post. If you had omitted the last sentence, you would have been able to end on a high note. Seriously, the google installer for chrome we have applications. In case this is not an official application for the windows store, it should be deleted . And by the way it's available to get chrome whenever i open my browser i get an annoying popup notification from google saying download chrome for a better evening, it annoys me. I use edge and ie. I guess microsoft should get their way in the appstore store -> have an edge installer that redirects some identities to some random msft internet site to mount the edge apk file .Eh, i'm not hurt. I've had complaints about chrome ever since they came to the conclusion that being simple and efficient is less valuable than being a pig. Deleted it and haven't looked back since edge got ublock origin This is payback for crashing the youtube app in the past!!!!!! pepperidge farm remembers Just in case young people need a history lesson.. https://www.Windowscentral.Com/google-microsoft-remove-youtube-windows-p...No history lessons needed, google immediately does the same with amazon fire wands. Except for fiascos like youtube, which basically wiped out the windows background. It doesn't hurt chrome or google at all. Maybe it is. But the actions of google also brought us a really great youtube app, which, according to most, was better than the official one. But most of them had to pay. @Lpb775 was there an official app for windows phone? I am confused by your statement. As far as i remember, almost everyone wants the ms version of windows background to be prettier than the android version of google. I think i should have put it more sensibly. Because google forced microsoft to remove their app, a third party saw fit to create their own software for windows, which many users say is better than google's android version. No, it won't win. T, however this will show google that people don't let you shape absolutely whatever you want, which ads will do. What about spotify and other apps that use the chromium embedded framework? These are available on the site. I tried to find a way to playboy.Com from spotify to no avail... Maybe there is a browser under the hood, but it's not general purpose browser This is not a blocking of chromium-based browsers, but a deletion of an application that does not comply with the rules of the store. Other apps that use chromium are fine as long as they stick to microsoft policy. Hahaha good job ms :d respects its own rules regarding youtube applications >violates ms rules by trying to put chrome on the windows market. Seems legit. Hey microsoft, if you're itching to get rid of the "glorified installer" app, here are 2-3 more. =Https2f/click.Linksynergy.Co...

Институтский 1-й проезд

Россия

Ачинск

Mauritania

https://steamauthenticator.net

Ачинск

02/18/2023 10:19:47